Showing posts with label fun. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fun. Show all posts

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Beauty in Mundanity - A Review of MFA Poetry Readings in the Narrative Format


            The poetry reading started not with a bang or a murmur, but with well-maintained introductions. I arrived just as the first reader was introduced – Blake something – or something Blake. I had biked here and was in all likelihood not the best smelling human being in the room, so I was a little distracted when they announced his name. He is an established author who has been published a number of times. He is known for his humor, and he writes prose. Tonight, Blake will be reading his short story “The Best Man,” which he admits to the audience is about his brother. It is hilarious. Irreverent and mundane, the story details the narrator and his brother’s trip to a tailor to get their tuxedos fitted. The story seems to me to be an expose of the relationship dynamics between the narrator (who, under first impression, appears to be a pretty solid reflection of Blake) and his brother. The short piece details exactly how the narrator feels about his brother and life in general. The whole thing was a surprisingly realistic and uncensored (at one point the narrator ponders “rubbing one out” to a Victoria’s Secret catalogue) portrayal of what goes on inside a man’s head. I thought it was wonderful.
            Following the reading I take a look around the room. There is wine and cheese in the corner. Pretentious? Yes. Delicious looking? Of course. Do I want some? Most definitely. Unfortunately I can’t reach the wine and cheese due to the massive crowd guarding the concessions. That’s when I notice that the room is full of people from my class who, like me, had waited till the last possible reading to attend. It’s always nice to know you’re not alone. Yay for procrastination.  The next reader comes up, a man named Tommy who will be reading us a few of his poems. Now until three months ago I had never really appreciated poetry. And while this quarter has changed my impression quite a bit, I was still shocked at how much I liked this guy’s poetry. He writes about the most profound things – the imprisoning feeling of small towns or the ubiquity of love in all aspects of life – and the most commonplace – masturbation and the sadness of losing your favorite chicken and waffles restaurant. His work truly showcased the potential for story and poetry in every moment.
            Tommy was soon replaced by prose writer Kendra Fish. I definitely caught her name because I thought Tommy had said ‘Fitch’ in his introduction of her. He did not. He said Fish. She was also very impressive. She read excerpts from a story entitled “Both, Sister, mother, More.” The narrative was difficult to follow because of how much she jumped around during her reading, but from what I gathered, the story was about a gypsy woman and her daughter trying to live a normal life in Belgium. The story dealt with heavy issues like self-identity and sexuality extremely well, never trivializing or demonizing them. It is a story that I can see coming together to be a masterpiece examination of character growth and the mother-daughter relationship.
            At this point my back was beginning to get tired from standing in the same position for an hour. But luckily the last person, a woman named Megan, began reading her poetry just as I was becoming uncomfortable. I did not like Megan’s poetry. Perhaps my mind was tainted with the pain in my back and odd smells emanating from my dried sweat, but I found very little intriguing or strictly poetic about her writing. To be fair to Megan, she is a phenomenal writer; she handles imagery better than most I've read. However, I found her poetry to be lacking in any strictly poetic qualities beyond vivid description, which should be a quality of all good writing. I thought her descriptions were beautiful and well-conceived – I just wouldn't call them poetry.
            And thusly the night ended. My classmates and I ushered up to the front to get Tommy and Megan’s signatures and we were off for long bike rides home and whatever else awaited us in the night outside – now armed with the knowledge that beauty and more can be found in every second we are living. 

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

On Getting Drunk

So this is not the next installment in my 2012 series. I'm working on that. I'll get it to you guys. But I was working on a response paper for a poem by Charles Baudelaire called "Get Drunk." Well that's what the English translation is called. I can neither pronounce nor read French, so I won't include any of that here. Anyway I liked the poem and had fun responding to it, so I thought I'd share it with you guys.

This is the poem:


“Get Drunk”

You have to be always drunk. That's all there is to it--it's the only way. So as not to feel the horrible burden of time which breaks your back and bends you to the earth, you have to be continually drunk.
But on what?  On wine, on poetry or on virtue, whatever you wish. But get drunk.
And if sometimes, on the steps of a palace, on the green grass of a ditch, in the mournful solitude of your room, you wake up again, the drunkenness already diminished or gone, ask the wind, the wave, the star, the bird, the clock, everything that is flying, everything that is groaning, everything that is rolling, everything that is singing, everything that is speaking. . .ask what time it is and the wind, the wave, the star, the bird, the clock will answer you: “It is time to get drunk!  So as not to be the martyred slaves of time, get drunk, get continually drunk!  On wine, on poetry or on virtue, whatever you wish."  

And here is my response (sorry for the formal structure, it's for class):

In Charles Baudelaire’s poem “Enivrez-Vous” (“Get Drunk”), he makes the bold declaration that we as humans must always be drunk, so as not to be crushed by the oppressive weight of life. He follows this with the assertion that it doesn’t matter on what we get drunk, whether it be “on wine, on poetry, or on virtue,” as long as we get drunk. Now I thought this argument was interesting, as “drunk” can be defined in a general sense as being unable to make one’s own decisions, and thus Baudelaire is arguing that it is better to go through life a slave to something else than it is to make well-thought out decisions. However, what is more interesting to me, though not entirely mutually exclusive, is the likening of poetry and virtue to substances equally as capable of robbing a person of sobriety as wine and the ways these substances can lead to insobriety.
            First let’s examine poetry. Poetry is a creation. Poetry and writing in general provide the deepest reflections of a soul. Poetry serves as a canvas for those who write it and a mirror for those who read it. Poetry reveals far more about the person interpreting it than it does its subject. So if this is our definition and understanding of poetry, then how is it intoxicating? I think that the expression and reflection a poem provides often results in passion. We have a passion for knowing ourselves and an even greater passion for knowing others. And from passion, both scientifically and emotionally, comes an elation that robs us of our self-control. We whoop for joy. We weep great tears. We scream in agony. So it seems that poetry intoxicates by playing to our passions and freeing us from our inhibitions.
            Now let’s take a look at virtue. Where poetry was freeing, virtue is confining. Virtue limits one’s actions to a set moral compass. While virtue’s limits on actions set it apart from the freed action of poetry and wine, it can still get someone drunk. By removing a person’s options, virtue allows for a certain freedom of decision. Morals limit a decision to one option, thereby removing the moment of crisis that comes with making said decision. Virtue removes one’s ability to make one’s decision by removing all decisions in one’s life, thereby adhering to our definition of “drunk.”
            Finally I think it’s important to consider what effect this has on the poem. Our initial reading of the poem suggested that Baudelaire is arguing that we be slaves rather than thinking beings. However, poetry suggests just the opposite - that we need to be freed from our inhibitions in order to live life to its fullest and not be “slaves of time.” Thus the lack of control inherent in being drunk, whether off wine or the passion of poetry, frees us from the weight of the world. However, virtue suggests that this inebriation is also possible through enslavement to a master other than time, namely morals. Virtue frees us from time by freeing us from decision, making us drunk off of morals. After examining poetry and virtue as inebriants, our reading must then be adapted to encompass the freedoms they supply. I propose instead that Baudelaire is suggesting that in order to live life to its fullest we must have all the cares of everyday life lifted from our shoulders in any way we can.

Not included in original essay -
I'm not sure if I agree with this poem or not. On one hand, I think drunkeness provides us with one extremely valuable resource: the ability to just say or do something without regard for other people's opinions. On the other hand there are few things I value more than intelligent discourse, which can only come about with carefully weighted decision making. So I think if we go with the final reading of the poem I proposed and limit it to certain situations, then I'd agree. For example, its a lot easier to tell a girl you think she's beautiful if you have given up on all your inhibitions. But those same inhibitions help us debate things like politics, science, religion, morals, literature, and pretty much everything else. So I think in making decisions of the self, our hearts should be ruled by passion or morality, but in decisions regarding others and matters of intellect we  should let our brains do the talking. But that's just my opinion, what do you think?

Monday, June 25, 2012

Travel Blog/Thoughts From Places: Fort Bragg and Lakeport


So I recently went back to my home town of Ukiah (located in smoky Mendocino County [heheh, get it? Cause Mendocino County has a lot of pot in it…]) for a week and a half. And while it used to be where I live, it is now a place I vacation at since I’ve been officially living as an independent adult in Southern California for three years. So I figured why not let Ramblings of a Cinephile become a travel blog for a day? So this week you’ll get to see what my home town is like-aren’t you excited? - Actually I just went through my photographs and I don’t have any pictures of Ukiah…because I lived there for a long time. However, I do have pictures of Fort Bragg and Lakeport, so instead I’ll tell you about my day trips to those places!

Fort Bragg

Wednesday June 20, 2012

It’s a day like any other summer day in Ukiah. And by that I mean it’s as hot as whatever circle of Hell is really hot, which is most of them. I think. I haven’t read Dante’s Inferno yet. Anyway it’s a smoltering (a word I just made up by the way) day like any other so my friends and I decide to go to the cool haven that is the coastal town of Fort Bragg for the day. We arrive in Fort Bragg around four p.m. after getting lost on some abandoned logging trails in Brook Trails. Now just passed Fort Bragg is a coastal beach called Ten Mile Beach.
Ten Mile Beach...from afar
And just passed Ten Mile Beach is a small patch of beach with the nicest sand I’ve found north of Monterey. My friends and I hung out there for a while, playing with sticks and sand and stuff. You know - fun, adult stuff.
I don't know those people. I hope they don't mind that
they're on the internet. Cause they're here to stay.



The driftwood graveyard

I peed in that cave.

My friend peeing in his own cave.

Here he is happy about being done.

Sarah peed in this cave. 

No one peed in this cave, cause it was kinda wet.
But I thought you guys should get to see all the caves.

I don't know what they are, but they are so cool

Feet.

The logman cometh

We had more fun than you would expect college kids
to have putting that stick in the sand.

"Hey dude wanna go to party?"
"Nope having too much fun putting this stick in the sand"
We ate at McDonald's entirely to order happy meals
and get the Pokemon toy that came with it.

Lakeport


Thursday, June 21, 2012

My sister owes me lunch so I make her buy me food at this awesome pizza place called Main Street Pizza (which I plan to review later this week), which is located in the only good city in one of the worst counties in Northern California: Lake County. Sorry people from Lake County, but you know it’s true. Anyway while we’re there we meet up with our mutual friend with whom we proceed to wander around downtown Lakeport.  



One of my favorite places in Lakeport is this huge used bookstore.
That one on the right is it. 
And this is the Iguana that lives there.

This is what remained of my pizza when it occurred to me to photograph it for the blog.

This is where Pillsbury Dough Boys are sent when they
become Pillsbury Dough Men. Kinda like Penn State.
OH! (Sorry about that...thought it was better than a Michael Jackson
or Catholic Church joke though.)

Thoughts From These Places


Thinking back on the trip I can’t help but ponder what it is that makes something like playing in sand or going through thrift stores fun. Is it the physical activity? The process by which our brain releases endorphins causing some sort of elation? I think that’s a portion of it. However, I believe it runs deeper than that. Because it wasn’t the act of shoving a stick into some sand and creating a weird archway or the joy of eating McDonald’s hamburgers, because that really isn’t a joy at all and I prefer when my stomach doesn’t rebel against my body. I enjoyed that time because I was doing it with good friends. I don’t know if this is a universally acknowledged truth, but I know for me fun stems from being around people I love and who love me back. Furthermore, I know one of my friends has been unhappy  with her life where she is living now, not because the area itself is bad (if the pictures make any case at all it is in fact to the contrary), but because she doesn’t have the people she loves most with her there. We humans are naturally social creatures I think, and even for introverts, like myself and probably most of you reading this, human contact, whether physical or emotional, is important in our enjoyment of this journey we call life. Cause we all need the human touch